We aim to make this site as accessible as possible and therefore have provided the settings below to use if you are finding it difficult to view this website. See the SFO Accessibility Statement for more information.

Where it is appropriate to provide a Welsh translation, you can switch to Cymraeg. See the Welsh Language Commissioner website for more information.

Use the settings button in the bottom right corner of the page to access these settings again.

We would like to use Analytics Cookies on our website. 

Turn these on below if you are happy with us collecting information on how our site is used, in order for us to improve the overall experience of our website. 

All other cookies are necessary and therefore by continuing to browse this website, you are agreeing to the usage of these cookies.

 See the SFO Privacy Policy for more information. 

Analytics Cookies

SFO recovers £4.4m from corrupt diplomats in ‘Chad Oil’ share deal

22 March, 2018 | News Releases

The SFO is set to recover millions lost in a corruption case which saw Griffiths Energy bribe Chadian diplomats in the United States and Canada.

Securing exclusive contracts with corrupt deals, Griffiths Energy bribed Chadian diplomats with discounted shares deals and ‘consultancy fees’ using a front company ‘Chad Oil’ – which was set up just five days before agreements were signed.

‘Chad Oil’ was a vehicle used by senior diplomats at the Chadian Embassy to the United States to facilitate a deal which saw the wife of the former Deputy Chief, Mrs Ikram Saleh purchase 800,000 shares at less than 0.001$CAD each, later selling them for significant profit.

Griffiths later self-reported these and other transactions as bribes intended to illegally secure commercial interests in Chad and pleaded guilty to corruption charges brought by the Canadian authorities.

Following the takeover by Griffiths Energy by a UK corporation and share sale via a UK broker, the corrupt proceeds entered the UK’s jurisdiction and the SFO began civil recovery proceedings to secure the £4.4m share sale profits from Ikram Saleh.

The matter was brought to a three-day trial at the High Court which today granted the SFO’s order to the value of £4.4m, the first time money has been returned overseas in a civil recovery case.

SFO Director, David Green CB QC said:

“Today’s ruling follows four years of tireless efforts by the SFO to recover the proceeds of this corrupt deal for oil in Chad.

“This is a positive result in the ongoing fight against criminals who attempt to hide their ill-gotten gains in our jurisdiction.”

The recovered money will be transferred to the Department for International Development (DFID) who will identify key projects to invest in that will benefit the poorest in Chad.

Minister of State for International Development, Harriett Baldwin said:

“The UK Government has a zero tolerance approach to corruption and today’s landmark judgment means this money can be used to help the people of Chad.

“DFID is already working in Chad, investing in humanitarian programmes and supporting safety nets to tackle poverty. We will now be working on the details of how these recovered funds can best help one of the poorest countries in the world.”

This follows two SFO landmark cases where funds recovered in bribery and corruption prosecutions were returned and reinvested in the country. When senior executives at Smith & Ouzman were convicted of foreign bribery in 2016, the SFO’s confiscation order paid for seven new ambulances in Kenya, while the Deferred Prosecution Agreement against Standard Bank involved payment of £4.9m to the Government of Tanzania.

Notes to editors:

  1. The trial followed a number of previous appeals against the Property Freezing Order which can be found here. More information about the SFO case against Chad Oil is available here.
  2. More details are also available on previous cases involving compensation paid to Kenya and Tanzania.
  3. Once received, the £4.4m will be held in trust by the SFO and entered into the Consolidated Fund, after which DFID will identify key established projects to invest the money in.
  4. The defendant has a maximum of 21 days in which to appeal today’s ruling.
  5. The SFO was represented in court by David Quest QC and Fiona Jackson.
  6. Mrs Saleh was represented in court by Jonathan Ashley-Norman QC and Nick Yeo.

Related Cases